1、2022-4-29供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍供应商考核系统供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍介绍供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍BackgroundTQRDC is Vendor Performance Measurement System based on below factors: T: TECHNOLOGY Q：QUALITY R：RESPONSIVENESS D：DELIVERY C：COST3M China developed local TQRDC database Since 2002.供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Benefits of this improved systemCan
2、improve our vendor management efficiency;3Mers can take the initiative;Including RM/CM/Trading/indirect vendors evaluationCan send specific report to vendor Data is from Consolidate source Information centralized control;Information share easily;All info can download to Excel for further edit;The in
3、terface is friendly.供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍T: Technology 10%Prototype/Sample Capability (Critical vendor of non- trading vendor) (30%)Technical document professionalism (Critical vendor for non- trading vendor) (10%)Statistical control meet 3M request ( for CM Vendor) (20%)Machine Capability( for CM Vendor)
4、(40%)PointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestPointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestPointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestPointCriteria/Results100Meet
5、 expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M request供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Q: Quality 30%Material Accepting Rate (50%)Product Quality Corrective Action and Preventive Action to vendor (30%)Quality System (20%)PointNumber of CAPA 10000=1 Case PointQuality Survey Results Quality Survey Result = 60 0=9
6、9.5%80=99%60=98.5%50=97%40=95%30=90%20=80%080%供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍R: Responsiveness 15%PointCriteria/Results100100% or there is no CAPA(SCAR) issued0100% PointCriteria/Results100100% purchase order confirm within 3 days096% Of promise dates are met8092% Of promise dates are met7088% Of promise dates are m
7、et6084% Of promise dates are met5080% Of promise dates are met4075% Of promise dates are met3070% Of promise dates are met2065% Of promise dates are met1060% Of promise dates are met0 = 60 days5030 days Payment Term 60 days0Payment Term 30 daysPointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M SMI reque
8、st60No 3M request on SMI0Not meet expectation on 3M SMI requestPointCriteria/Results100Cost Competitive50Same as Competition0Higher than CompetitionPointCriteria/Results100Cost decrease50No Reductions/Cost avoidance0Cost increase供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Vendor Type Rating DifferenceTQRDCTQRDCCritical RMCritica
9、l RM CM Vendor CM Vendor others othersTraderTraderT TNon-Trading Vendor 10Non-Trading Vendor 10Trading vendor 0Trading vendor 0Prototype/Sample Capability80%80%30%30%1st 1st survey survey ratingrating0 0Technical document professionalism20%20%10%10%0 0Statistical control0%0%20%20%0 0Machine capabili
10、ty0%0%40%40%0 0Q QNon-Trading Vendor 30Non-Trading Vendor 30Trader/oversea vendorTrader/oversea vendor 3030Material Accepting Rate50%50%50%50%50%50%60%60%Corrective Action and Preventive Action30%30%30%30%30%30%40%40%Quality system20%20%20%20%20%20%0%0%R RNon-Trading Vendor 15Non-Trading Vendor 15Tr
11、ading vendor 20Trading vendor 20Timeliness of Correction Active Feedback20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%Timeliness of Purchase Order Confirm25%25%25%25%25%25%25%25%Timeliness of document receiving Confirm10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%Communication about Product Change 15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%Product EHS & Regulat
12、ion compliance30%30%30%30%30%30%30%30%D DNon-Trading Vendor 25Non-Trading Vendor 25Trading vendor 30Trading vendor 30On Time Delivery100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%C CNon-Trading Vendor 20Non-Trading Vendor 20Trading vendor 20Trading vendor 20Payment Term 15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%SMI Implemented20%2
13、0%20%20%20%20%20%20%Competitive costs 15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%Cost reductions50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍The web site address: http:/cnoss01/bihome/QlikView/homepage.aspx User name is default as employee number;After you get this page, please click QlikView Supply Chain TQRDC to go to the
14、main interfaceLogin interfaceClick to view TQRDC rating documentClick to install the Plug-in before using QlikView供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍This System has two parts:TQRDC For Indirect Vendor - Supplier Performance Measurement TQRDC For Direct Vendor - TQRDC Evaluation Report 供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍TQRDC Evaluation Repo
15、rtSelect mark dividerSelect Year & MonthLanguageSelection fieldCondition filedTQRDC MarkFor Direct VendorSend to ExcelHelp buttonNavigator供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍TQRDC Evaluation Report-CN供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍TQRDC Evaluation Report-EN供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍How to print供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Select “TQRDC Evaluation Report”The search
16、 condition will show you four fields:Classifications;Country;Vendor Type;Buyer code;After you enter search conditions, please select Year & Month on the top. TQRDC Conditions供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Classifications; LCL-Local vendor IMP-Oversea vendorVendor Type;Vendor TypeDescriptionDTDirect TraderDCDirect CM
17、 VendorDHDirect Hard Goods vendorDRDirect RM vendorCTCritical Direct TraderCCCritical Direct CM VendorCHCritical Direct Hard Goods vendorCRCritical Direct RM vendorTQRDC ConditionsBuyer codenameLocation1April HuCHJ 6002Helen NiuSZ5Mary WuXQ6Jessie WangCHJ 6007Janet TuCHJ 6008Sammy GuCHJ 600eFairy Li
18、uXQfMay MeiCHJ 600lJulia GengGZmMaggie ZhangCHJ 600oLeosen ChenXQqFaye DongCHJ 600vCharles WangJSBuyer Code Summary;供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Country codeCountry CodeDescriptionCountry CodeDescriptionCountry CodeDescriptionAPAsia PacificHKHong KongPHIPhilippinesARArgentinaHOLHollandPOLPolandATAustriaHUHungaryRU
19、RussiaAUSAustraliaILIsraelSA South AfricaBELBelgiumINIndiaSINSingaporeBRABrazilINDIndonesiaSPASpainCANCanadaIREIrelandSWESwedenCLChileITAItalySWISwitzerlandCNP. R. ChinaJAPJapanTHAThailandCOLColombiaKORKoreaTRTurkeyDENDenmarkMALMalaysiaTWTaiwanUREuropeMEXMexicoUKUnited KingdomFIFinlandMTMaltaUSAUSAF
20、RAFranceNZNew ZealandVEVenezuelaGERGermanyPANPanamaVNVietnam供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍On Time Delivery DetailsSend to ExcelOn time delivery detailsClick here, you can select 0 or 1, 0-not OT, 1- OT供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍On Time Delivery RatioOn time delivery ratio by year/monthClick +, get detailsSend to ExcelClick -, g
21、o back to summary供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍NMR DetailsSend to ExcelNMR Details供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍NMR RatioNMR Ratio summaryClick +, get detailsClick -, go back to summarySend to Excel供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Survey DetailsSend to Excel供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍On Time Delivery Ratio (Trend)On Time Delivery (Trend)供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍NMR Ratio (
22、Trend)NMR Ratio (Trend)供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍3Mer InitiativesBuyer have right to input “Bad Case” for- Document Receiving Confirmation- Product Change Notice- SMI ImplementedSCAR (Supplier Corrective Action Report) can be sent to vendor by- Buyer for poor R & D performance - Quality engineer for poor produc
23、t qualitySurvey mark can be input by different functions for - Prototype/Sample Capability for Critical vendor by Technical Engineer- Technical document professionalism for Critical vendor by Technical Engineer-Statistical control for CM vendor by CM Engineer- Machine Capability for CM vendor by CM
24、Engineer - Vendor Quality System by Quality Engineer - Product EHS & Regulations Compliance by Toxicology Engineer-Competitive Cost with same level competitor by Sourcing Engineer 供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍Bad Case InputData For RMust input reason for bad caseInput new case供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍SCAR InputData for R2022-4-29供应商考核系统TQRDC介绍
